|
| Welcome Guest |
|
| |
Message posted by sodapoptart on 09 October 2009 at 3:32pm - IP Logged
|
|
|
| sodapoptart |
 |
Standard Member
 |
 |
AZ
19 August 2010
610 Posts |
|
|
|
THANKS J Suit survives critical hearing!!! The judge so far has refused ZerO’s demands to dismiss it!!!
The judge repeatedly questions ZerO’s attorneys. [This time he is getting defended by the Dept of Justice!!! You are paying for his attorneys!!!]
DOJ is demanding a dismissal but instead the judge repeatedly asked about how impeachment would work and what would be the results. ZerO’s DOJ attorneys refused to answer; insisting only that it can not happen, and he was legally elected.
Judge did not get his questions answered and so decided to study the issue of impeachment and give a decision ’later’:
"WND Exclusive BORN IN THE USA?
Obama eligibility case survives 1st court test
Judge hears arguments, refuses immediate dismissal demand
Posted: October 05, 2009
4:29 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
A federal judge in California today listened to government lawyers argue that a lawsuit over President Obama’s eligibility should be immediately dismissed but refused to grant their request, saying he would make his decision and announce it later.
The result came this morning from U.S. District Judge David Carter, who already has set a tentative trial date for the dispute Jan. 26, 2010. The judge also already had lawyers draw up a tentative schedule for hearings and deadlines in preparation for the trial.
...
Kreep told WND after the hearing it appeared to him the judge was expecting answers and failed to get them from government attorneys during the hearing.
"He was asking the [Department of Justice] to explain impeachment... how would that work."
Kreep said he argued impeachment wasn’t relevant, since "you have to have a valid, elected president." He said a court hearing with full disclosure of evidence is required, since the impeachment provision wouldn’t technically apply to someone who never was qualified to be president.
But Kreep said he argued that a simple numbers formula also doesn’t apply. Many of the government arguments have noted the candidates who are plaintiffs, such as Keyes, did not have a reasonable mathematical probability of winning the presidential election.
That assertion is not relevant, Kreep said he argued. Had Obama’s ineligibility been publicized before the election, Hillary Clinton likely would have become the nominee, and she might have been vulnerable to other candidates, he said...
Lawyers representing Obama in the case claim "no single federal district court has the power to declare that a sitting president is not fit or qualified to occupy the office, and is, therefore, not a legitimate president."
More info from WND
DON’T KNOW, DON’T KNOW, DON’T KNOW. I AM JUST THE MESSENGER.
SODA
-----------------
|
|
|
|
| |
Message posted by sodapoptart on 12 October 2009 at 1:19pm - IP Logged
|
|
|
| sodapoptart |
|
Standard Member
|
|
AZ
19 August 2010
610 Posts |
|
|
|
Judge ordered ’Early Discovery’ by this Thursday, Oct 15:
How did we miss this one:
U.S. District Judge David Carter ordered ’Early Discovery’, meaning Obama’s lawyers must produce documents, including his hospital records, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures, by this Thursday, Oct 15, 2009.
As best I can determine, Early Discovery, in this U.S. District Court, means that the information must be surrendered to the Judge and only the Judge. (Any attorney care to correct or expound on this?)
It might be withheld from the plaintiffs and their their lawyers, and of course from the press and you and I. It will be of great interest to see if Obama’s tax-payer-funded attorneys will comply or resist, and after Oct 15 another ruling can be expected from U.S. District Judge David Carter, based on what he did or did not receive.
I AM JUST THE MESSENGER, THE ABOVE ARE NOT MY WORDS.
-----------------
|
|
|
|
If you wish to post a reply to this thread you must first Login
|
Topic: B O
